Comments on: Interpretation please

By: Tim Ireland

Tim Ireland — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:15:35 +0000

Don’t you wish now that you’d gone for that front-page blog on another.com that some bright chap suggested as far back as 2001?

;o)

By: J-Bo

J-Bo — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:31:23 +0000

Darling, it’s just me and the kids, Billie got a bit of jam stuck under the mouse and we kept ending up at your site. Sorry. Actually not as sorry as we were, WHAT ON EARTH are you going on about?

By: Russ Taylor

Russ Taylor — Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:32:02 +0000

You get way more readers than you think: I always leave my crumpled copy of Bowblog on the tube for others to enjoy.

By: Astrid

Astrid — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:43:38 +0000

Well, count yourself chuffed. I get a measly 168 a week which I am personally rather pleased with seeing as a month ago it was only 14! BUT – I am on sitemeter.com and from what I can glean – only around 25-30% actually read anything and if they do it’s mainly the what I consider to be more boring posts which is fairly frustrating. But at least some people are reading and more recently I have noticed people are coming back – which is nice…..

By: James

James — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:42:44 +0000

There is actually no one visiting your site. The 11,000 readers you think you saw were actually caused by a glitch in the matrix, it will be fixed promptly.

By: Robin Grant

Robin Grant — Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:08:45 +0000

If you switch your feeds to feedburner.com (and turn your old ones off) suddenlly your stats will not be contaminted with newsreader traffic AND you’ll know exactly how many subscribers you have.

Which will be a step forward at least…