The curatorial twitch

One of George Bowbrick's books - full of newspaper and magazine cuttings

My dad was book mad. He owned a couple of thousand books, mostly non-fiction. He was an old-school, working class, self-taught polymath, a bus conductor-know-all (I’ve written about his dictionaries before). And he had this habit. He would snip cuttings from newspapers and magazines. Almost daily he’d snip a story of some import and file it away inside one of his many books.

And there was method in this compulsive snipping and filing. The cutting always went inside a book of some relevance to the story – cuttings about Kennedy and Nixon inside an American history, cuttings about captured Nazis inside a book about the war. An Alan Coren column in a Thurber collection. Some books were bulging – mum and I used to laugh as we pulled a book down from a shelf and a confetti of cuttings fell out.

But this carefully-assembled distributed scrapbook was pointless – an essentially write-only collection that was destined never to to be seen (the fact that the whole lot was destroyed in a flood at Christmas is just a melancholy full stop to the story). No one was ever going to read or reflect on these cuttings. And there’s an exact parallel with my dad’s manic clipping and saving in the universal curatorial reflex of the social networks. The three-stage process: see something interesting, read it and then – click – it’s shared. It’s a kind of twitch, already so natural that we’ve forgotten how we got started and when.

Sharing is now so part of the process that it influences the kind of content we absorb. I’d love the paywalls to work but I suspect they’ll fail because they short-circuit this curatorial reflex. I cancelled my Times subscription when I realised that being unable to share the marvellous stuff in there – Aaronovitch, Moran, Finkelstein – made it less valuable. I enjoyed it less because I couldn’t share it with my friends. The big publishers can’t ignore the curatorial habit – they’ll have to adjust their offerings to accommodate the twitch.

I clip and save obsessively too (is it a heritable trait?). Since we closed I’ve been posting things at and at /Reading. Audiolibre’s a bit like Speechification but I’m sticking to sound recordings that are free to republish. Public domain, creative commons, out-of-copyright stuff that’s explicitly shared by its owners (like the RTE programme that’s at the top now). And there’s plenty of this stuff out there too but it’s a bit of an adventure and I’m looking for new sources (send me your favourites).

And /Reading is a straight copy of James Bridle’s Mattins. He’s been reading bits of books he loves into his phone for a while now (although he’s evidently on a break right now). This is a twist on the trusted guide thing. I trust James to switch me onto writing I wouldn’t have met otherwise and the excerpt he reads makes the whole thing more vivid – and I can listen on the way to work. He’s been reading mainly fiction and poetry but I’m focused (like my old man) on non-fiction – and I’m trying to dig up stuff you won’t find on the non-fiction table at Waterstones. Like this out-of-print anthology of writing about the industrial revolution collected by Mass Observation founder Humphrey Jennings.

/Reading is more of an experiment – should I publish my reading with no commentary or should I add a short review or some context? Will people find my selections useful or are they just bleeding chunks too short to inform a decision? Is this legitimate recommendation or self-indulgence? Will publishers be OK with these short readings? /Reading uses Audioboo because it’s just so accessible (and because it’s easy to lift and embed the audio). For Audiolibre I’ve used an HTML 5 player which means it’ll work on an iPhone or an iPad. Both are available as podcasts and that seems like the right way to package this stuff.

I’ll keep collecting and sharing (because I can’t help it) and I’ll see what happens – tell me what you think and suggest new audio sources and books too.


  1. Pop theory…

    I think collecting and sharing are very different things.

    Collecting is often about order, completion or control (or a desire to try and achieve these things).

    Sharing is often about a route to publicly define yourself (that’s not to say there aren’t external benefits to that desire too).

    The successful tools will be the ones that speak to these functions. Part of the reason I think Twitter works is that it services people’s implicit desire to ensure their thoughts are heard. I have thoughts, I have followers. I send things that define or describe me and as I can see a follower number I know it is worth my while to continue doing that.

  2. I think reading some ones online scapegoat book is a great idea. Especially if like your dads collection it was themed.

  3. I have a (large) number of books, but I have not read more than a small proportion of them. It may be that I am a small cottage librarian, waiting for lenders to arrive. And since local libraries are now closing due to cuts in public spending, perhaps I should open my doors?

  4. Could you create a service (a plugin?) to a book service like Shelfari, where you ‘inserted’ a clipping from online into a book of relevant subject matter? That would be a tribute to your Dad’s approach.

  5. I like reading other people’s reading lists but am often more interested in the curator’s story than the book itself.

    My favourite books are not just those whose pictures still play in my head but the ones that evoke the memory of when I first read them. I’m finding this even more when reading old children stories to my son – childhood memories I’d completely forgotten.

    My ultimate collection would give the story of each book’s existence rather than a textual analysis. Like the beautiful history of your Dad’s collection and its tragic,heartwrenching end.

    I have an unfinished copy of War and Peace which I started when I was 14 and don’t intend to finish. I can’t bear to part with it though. I broke my leg as a teenager but could only get the wheelchair into the school library. I figured if I was going to be stuck there for weeks I better read something hefty. Only I got better before I finished it.
    It was an attempt at an intellectual ‘fuck you’ to the teachers who’d failed to give me any lessons, so whenever they decided to visit, I’d proudly declare I was reading War & Peace. I was living the bohemian dream: reading Tolstoy, bravely smoking in the school field (because I couldnt climb the fence with friends) and graffitying my leg with names of similarly rebellious bands I’d probably never heard play.
    I remember very little about the book except that the characters’ names were very long.

  6. Thanks for your comments guys. I totally agree with Matt that curation is a kind of self-expression – it can be a hugely generous gesture and also, basically, showing off. But I think it’s one of the really distinctive things about the social web – and I’m also pretty sure it’s making us all a bit cleverer and better-informed…

    And I’d love to go round shoving cuttings (which I guess would take the form of annotations or sidenotes) into books at Google books or Shelfari or LibraryThing. Somebody invent that.

    And, Em, this is really why I’m enjoying the /Reading thing – I’m rediscovering old books and looking at books differently – as sources for readings… I’m also wondering if I should start ‘sexing up’ the readings a bit – how about a soundtrack? I’ve already started to read them in ‘locations’ – lately the Quaker Garden on Euston Road and the British Library courtyard. That might add colour mightn’t it?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *